Facts on DUIs and Drugged Driving
To provide insight into the prevalence of drugged driving, consider the following statistics and facts:
- Per the 2013 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), based on a 12-month lookback, approximately 9.9 million Americans in the 12-or-older age group (3.8 percent of this population) reported that they drove under the influence of illicit drugs.
- Comparatively, more people drive under the influence of alcohol than illicit drugs; based on a 12-month lookback, in 2013, approximately 28.7 million Americans (10.9 percent) reported that they drove under the influence of alcohol.
- According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s (NHTSA’s) 2013-2014 National Roadside Survey, greater than 22 percent of apprehended drivers drove under the influence of illicit drugs, prescription drugs, or over-the-counter drugs.
- The NHTSA survey noted that from day to night, the rate of illicit drug use increased while prescription drug use waned from day to night.
- Regarding fatal crashes, a 2010 study revealed that 11.4 percent involved a drugged driver.1
Survey information also provides insight into the prevalence of drugged driving in certain demographics. For instance, in 2010, 26.2 percent of car crashes resulting in a fatality involved a drugged driver who was 50 years or older. At the younger end of the age scale, it is more likely that young people in the 18-25 age group will drive under the influence of alcohol or other drugs compared to Americans aged 26 or older. In terms of sex, according to the NSDUH, more males than females drive under the influence of alcohol and other drugs.2
Facts on Teens and Alcohol Use:
- Almost half of all 10th graders drink alcohol.
- Car accidents are the number one cause of death among young Americans 16-19 years of age.
- Teen use of alcohol results in an average of 4,700 fatalities per year.
- While one in six teenagers binge drink, only one in 100 parents think their children binge drink.
Research on the most common drugs abused before driving, when a fatal accident is involved, indicate marijuana in first place (46.5 percent), prescription drugs in second place (36.9 percent), and cocaine in third place (9.8 percent). Regarding prescription drugs, information was not reported regarding whether there was an intent to abuse the medication, but the most common drugs present in the blood of the deceased drivers were benzodiazepine sedatives Xanax (12.1 percent) and Valium (8.4 percent). The most common prescription pain relievers present were Vicodin (11.1 percent) and OxyContin (10.2 percent).
Despite the research that exists on drugged driving, the true numbers associated with this activity are unknown. Part of the reason owes to the fact that law enforcement will not typically test for drugs once a person is found to have a blood alcohol content high enough to support a DUI charge.3 As there is a more established precedent for arrests for alcohol, drugged driving detection is likely to be lower when alcohol and other drugs are present.
Regarding the statistics on the prevalence of marijuana, medical marijuana may be included. The decriminalized legal status of marijuana in some states complicates DUI cases. Research shows that in 2010, marijuana was found in the blood of deceased drivers three times more than in 1999 cases.4 Although it may not conclusively be known that the use of medical marijuana caused the fatal crashes, researchers assume that the legality of marijuana is contributing to use, which in turn is leading to driving after using marijuana, and this can escalate the risks of accidents.
Dangers of DUI and Drugged Driving
According to the National Institute on Drug Abuse, future research studies should consider how much of a given drug is required to cause driving impairment. This information is, however, difficult to determine because of factors, such as a person’s individual physiology (i.e., rate of metabolism) and the different half-lives of different drugs.
In the alcohol context, the general guideline is that a 0.08 blood alcohol content and above makes driving unsafe and illegal. As there are numerous drugs, both illegal and legal, that can cause driving impairments, some states (discussed below) have enacted laws that prohibit any drug use before operating a vehicle (with the exception of drugs that do not have psychoactive effects, such as aspirin). This approach circumnavigates the difficult task of knowing how much of a specific drug would cause an increased risk of impaired driving.
At present, the most constructive guidance is for the public and law enforcement to know the side effects of different drugs and consider how they would translate into driving hazards. The following are the most common drugs of abuse and their side effects:
- Marijuana: Drowsiness, slowed reaction time, and trouble with coordination and balance can result in lane weaving, impaired reaction time, and lack of attention to the road. These effects are likely to be intensified when alcohol is also present.
- Cocaine: The erratic, jumpy, and/or violent behavior associated with cocaine use can lead to aggressive driving, including speeding.
- Heroin: Sleepiness, a common side effect, can result in falling asleep at the wheel and severely impair driving skills.
- Methamphetamine: As with cocaine, this drug can trigger aggressive behavior and lead to road rage, erratic driving, and a disregard of other road rules.
- Prescription opioids: A driver may experience confusion and drowsiness, which can trigger many problems that can cause accidents.6
A fatal accident is an unfortunate risk of alcohol or drugged driving. According to Mothers Against Drunk Driving, on average a person will drive drunk 80 times before the first arrest.6Regarding fatalities, each year in America, 11,000 lives are lost due to DUI-involved accidents.7 Alarmingly, 33 percent of individuals who are arrested for DUI have a prior record for drunk or drugged driving.
There is a trend that drunk driving rates are on a modest decline. However, this decrease may be attributed more to increased safety measures built into the cars than to greater responsibility on the part of drivers.8
DUIs, Drugged Driving, and the Law
Historically, state laws developed with the foremost purpose of criminalizing driving under the influence of alcohol rather than other drugs. Most states have DUI laws that are constructed and construed as a catchall to encompass alcohol as well as other drugs. However, some states have gone beyond their existing DUI laws to pass a drugged driving criminal statute. Of those states that have express anti-drugged driving laws, 19 take a strict per se approach.9 Under these laws, the presence of any prohibited drugs, even without evidence of impairment, is a chargeable criminal offense.
Per se laws are only one criminalization approach to drugged driving. At least three states have taken a different approach. New York, California, and Hawaii have separate laws to reflect the crimes of driving under the influence of alcohol, driving under the influence of a drug other than alcohol, and driving under the influence of a combination of alcohol and another drug.10 These state laws focus on the type of drug consumed when determining the appropriate sanction.
Legal Drugs Can Lead to a Drugged Driving Arrest
State laws typically refer to the presence of a “drug” and do not spell out the particular types of drugs within the applicable statute’s scope. Prosecutors and judges can construe “drug” to include medicinal marijuana (taken legally), over-the-counter-medications, and prescription medications, such as the sleeping pill Ambien or the pain reliever OxyContin. The court’s interpretation of the law as well as case precedents in the state will determine which factors are relevant to a drugged driving case in which the drug at issue is legal, such as an over-the-counter medication. For example, California goes as far as to specifically state that the legality of a drug cannot be used as a defense in a drugged driving case.
Although state laws vary, all states have an interest in police officer detection of drugged driving after a stop. Each of the 50 states and the District of Columbia provides law enforcement with the opportunity to receive a certification as Drug Recognition Experts (DRE). In addition to detection, the program is designed to help officers understand how to provide evidence to properly support a subsequent drugged driving trial.11
Breathalyzer devices are the common roadside test for alcohol, and they are considered reliable. However, roadside drug testing is a different and more challenging matter for numerous reasons, including how some drugs (such as the THC in marijuana) have a long life in the body, which in turn makes it difficult to pinpoint when the use occurred. The nature of alcohol consumption and metabolism precludes the issue of a long drug life. As there is a narrower time window in which alcohol can be present in the body, it is easier to establish that there was a short period between use and driving compared to other drugs.
In response to the need for roadside drug detection, Kentucky, among other states, is in the process of testing portable drug detection kits.12 Though the presence of drugs is typically detected by a blood or urine test, the kit focuses on the saliva. The kit includes a screening device and mouth swab that can detect 10 different drugs. In addition to supporting greater road safety, a benefit of the kit is that it can help officers to meet the standard for an arrest (probable cause) when it is more likely than not that the driver has used a drug. Currently, the kits are in the trial phase, but if proven to be successful, Kentucky lawmakers may enact legislation to mandate use of these kits in roadside exams.13
Roadside Stop, Arrest, and Beyond
Criminal law is a hybrid of state and federal constitutional rights. Per federal law as codified in the laws of the 50 states, an officer must have a reasonable suspicion of criminal activity in order to stop a car. A reasonable suspicion is a low standard and can arise when an officer observes a minor traffic infraction, such as blown taillight or abnormal driving behavior like swerving. To test the reasonable suspicion, the officer is permitted to ask the driver to consent to a field sobriety test or breathalyzer test. If a driver declines to have the test (which is the driver’s right), that alone is not typically enough to warrant arrest because an officer needs a reasonable cause (a higher standard) to take a driver into custody.
Even short of giving the driver a test, the officer may believe that an arrest is warranted, based on other evidence, and proceed with the arrest. If a breathalyzer test shows a BAC of 0.08 or greater, an arrest is warranted per se.14
Again, roadside drug testing is a new phenomenon, and officers may not have a testing device available to them. If an arrest is made due to a reasonable suspicion of drugged driving, urine or blood testing will occur at the station or in a hospital/clinic. The results will then be evidence in the drugged driving case and used to support or defend a conviction. State laws and practices differ as to whether a person in custody can speak with or meet with an attorney before the testing occurs. A person’s Fifth Amendment right to speak with legal counsel typically attaches once the person is in custody, so at a minimum, a request for an attorney (or to remain silent) can be made upon or after the arrest.15 At the precinct, the arrested individual will be booked, and at some point, a bail determination will be made.
Hiring an Attorney
A DUI case can move swiftly. The best way to find an attorney is through a trusted source or a referral from the local bar association that maintains a database of criminal law specialists. But however one comes to find an attorney, some key pieces of information should be learned before retaining one.
Many attorneys will provide a brief free consultation. During a consultation, learn the attorney’s credentials. Find out how much experience the attorney has in drunk or drugged driving cases. Learn the outcomes of that representation. Discuss key components of the case and find out if the attorney’s proposed strategy sounds prudent. Discuss the attorney’s fee schedule: Is it flat or hourly? Based on the information collected, assess whether the attorney is appropriate financially and can offer the best representation.
The next significant step in the legal system is likely to be the arraignment (typically within a few days, and a defense attorney may attend). The judge will read the charges to the defendant, take the defendant’s plea, and either set a trial date (if “not guilty”) or decide sentencing or set a sentencing hearing date (if “guilty”).16 DUI cases are unique in that if the legal limit of alcohol is detected, or the presence of a drug (in a per sejurisdiction), there is little room to argue the facts case (trials are about resolving disputed facts).
Sentencing depends on a host of factors, such as whether the indicted person has a former history of DUI or if any aggravating factors were present, such as children being in the car. Generally, a judge will not exercise too much discretion in the sentencing process and is bound to the sentencing guidelines relevant to the conviction (this helps to standardize the penalization process). Most DUI cases will include fines and penalties. State law or the motor vehicle authority may require that convicted individuals complete a mandatory number of hours at DUI school.
How Much Does a DUI Cost?
In addition to obvious costs, like penalties and fines, a DUI is associated with numerous unexpected expenses. The total cost relates, in part, to whether it’s a first offense or repeat offense. Some resources estimate that a DUI can cost $10,000 or more. The following are some possible sources of out-of-pocket costs as well as a dollar amount range:
- Bail: $150-$2,500
- Probation costs: $600-$1200
- Defense attorney: $2,500-$5,000
- Ignition interlock device: $500-$1500
- Court fines: $150-$1,800
- Higher car insurance premiums: $4,500-$10,000
- DUI school: $1,000-$2,500
- Alternate transportation: $100-$1,000
- Impoundment: $100-$1,200
- License reinstatement: $21-$100
Some states impose minimum jail times, some have no jail minimums, and others will provide an option for community service in lieu of serving jail time. States vary in the severity of their jail sentencing. For instance, in New York, a first offense includes no minimum sentence, a second offense can lead to five days in jail or the option for 30 days of community service, and a third offense may lead to 10 days in jail or community service for 60 days.17 However, compare New York to Texas. In Texas, a first, second, and third offense carries 3 days, 30 days, or 2 years in jail, respectively (with no community service option available).18
As an alternative to a jail sentence, some state judges will consider ordering the convicted individual to partake in drug treatment services.19 The first step is for a qualified counselor to meet the individual and conduct a comprehensive needs assessment. The counselor will then make a recommendation to the judge. The judge may decide to order the convicted person to any level of different available services. For example, a person who presents a mild case of abuse may be required to attend one to two counseling sessions or be referred to a community-based program, such as Alcoholics Anonymous. In more severe cases, the individual may be ordered to attend a comprehensive inpatient or outpatient program that lasts for weeks or months. Judges also have the discretion to require individuals to attend presentations, known as “victim impact panels,” in which people directly affected by drunk or drugged driving warn about the dangers and express their pain over the tragic outcomes they have personally experienced.20
A DUI arrest/conviction can signal the need for recovery treatment. However, there is no set rule for when a person should seek admission to a rehab center. There is a general consensus that it is never too early or too late to seek recovery services, especially since recovery can help to prevent accidents.
When a person is referred to a recovery center through the criminal justice system, there may be a concern that treatment will not be effective because it did not start voluntary; however, most research has found otherwise. People who are in recovery as a direct result of court order tend to have increased rates of program attendance and stay in treatment for longer periods of time.21 It is well-established in the field of substance abuse treatment that the length of stay in a rehab program is a factor that improves attainment and maintenance of sobriety.
- “Drug Facts: Drugged Driving.” (May 2015). National Institute on Drug Abuse. Accessed Sept. 25, 2015.
- Briggs, B. (Feb. 15, 2014). “Pot Fuels Surge in Drugged Driving Deaths.” NBC News. Accessed Sept. 18, 2015.
- “Commonly Abused Drug Charts.” (Aug. 2015). National Institute on Drug Abuse. Accessed Sept. 18, 2015.
- “Statistics.” (n.d). MADD. Accessed Sept. 18, 2015.
- “DrinkingAndDriving.Org (DADO) 501c3 Teaching and Inspiring the Prevention of Drunk Driving.” (n.d.). Drinking and Driving.org. Accessed Sept. 18, 2015.
- “Drug Impaired Driving Laws.” (Sept. 2015). Governor’s Highway Safety Association. Accessed Sept. 18, 2015.
- Wynn, M. (Sept. 16, 2015). “KY Considering Roadside Driver Drug Tests.” The Courier-Journal. Accessed Sept. 18, 2015.
- “The ABCs of BAC.” (n.d.). National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Accessed Sept. 18, 2015.
- “Miranda Warning.” (n.d.). Legal Information Institute. Accessed Sept. 18, 2015.
- “DUI Arraignment.” (n.d.). Find Law. Accessed Sept. 18, 2015.
- “New York DWI Law.” (n.d.). Nolo. Accessed Sept. 18, 2015.
- “Texas DWI Law.” (n.d.). Nolo. Accessed Sept. 18, 2015.
- “Court-Mandated Treatment for Convicted Drinking Drivers.” (n.d.). National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. Accessed Sept. 18, 2015.
- “Is legally Mandated Treatment Effective?” (Apr. 2014). National Institute on Drug Abuse. Accessed Sept. 18, 2015.